What is hardware abstraction?

What is hardware abstraction, and what benefits does it provide when you acquire or generate signals for, for example, test equipment, data acquisition, or control systems?

Hardware abstraction: Why and when?

When a computer program needs to communicate with a piece of hardware, a driver is required to provide the program with an interface to the hardware. The driver is typically specific to a given piece of hardware, which means that when you use the driver in a program, you largely lock yourself into that instrument. In most cases, you will not be able to replace the hardware without integrating a new driver into the program, and therefore the hardware offers only very limited flexibility.

The solution is to introduce a hardware abstraction layer (HAL) so that the program is separated from the driver. The program communicates with the hardware only through a HAL, which means the program does not need to know which specific hardware it is working with. The program knows the hardware only through an alias, which the HAL translates to the actual hardware. The hardware is said to be abstracted, as all the specific details are hidden from the program.

HAL makes it easy to replace one instrument with another, as you only need to point the program’s alias to a different instrument. This requires no changes to the software itself, only to its configuration.

Read more about our industry expertise

Hardware abstraction at GPower

Typically, hardware abstraction is implemented based on the type of instrument, so the instruments can be divided into groups. The challenge, however, is that a type A instrument cannot be replaced by a type B instrument—even if both have the required functionality for a given measurement. For example, both a multimeter and an oscilloscope can measure a DC voltage, despite being very different.

At GPower, we address this challenge by basing our hardware abstraction on functionality rather than instrument type, which provides greater flexibility in the use of hardware and therefore easier data acquisition. All instruments that implement the same functionality can therefore be easily replaced, and it only requires a change in the software configuration.

Latest releases

Error handling in LabVIEW [2:4]

Error handling in LabVIEW [2:4]

This post [2:4] is part of a series by GPower’s software developer, Jesper Kjær Sørensen, on building robust software and test systems. Do you know the feeling…? “But it worked on my machine!” That’s the mantra of every programmer who hasn’t mastered error handling. Of course, you would never say

Read more »
Two new Certified LabVIEW Developers at GPower

Two new Certified LabVIEW Developers at GPower

Big congratulations to Serkan Akbulut and Jakob Alsaker, who last week achieved the Certified LabVIEW Developer (CLD) certification—an internationally recognised validation of skills in developing professional and maintainable LabVIEW applications. The Certified LabVIEW Developer certification, which among other things focuses on code quality, documentation, and architecture, is the second level

Read more »

Read our other blog posts

Don’t let your error codes become the next Blue Screen of Death [3:4]
Don’t let your error codes become the next Blue Screen of Death [3:4]
Try GPower IO-Link for LabVIEW and TestStand FREE for 90 days!
Get 90 days of free access to the GPower IO-Link toolkit [Direct integration with LabVIEW and TestStand]
GPower and IDA launch free LabVIEW course for students and recent graduates
GPower and IDA launch free LabVIEW course for students and recent graduates